Human Oversight Evidence
The first professional application of Digital Architecture for Human Subjectness: a record surface for showing what a human actually reviewed before an AI-assisted consequential decision.
What It Is
Human Oversight Evidence is the professional layer of Caneni. It does not merely assert that a human was in the loop. It records what the human saw, where the AI boundary was drawn, what consequence mattered, and what return condition was accepted.
It is the first public application of Digital Architecture for Human Subjectness — the design category for systems that keep humans recognisably present as sources of judgment and accountability in AI-assisted decisions.
Why It Matters
A human was assigned to oversee the system.
Here is what the human reviewed, limited, accepted, and committed to revisit.
The difference becomes visible when a decision is challenged after the fact.
EU AI Act Context
Article 50 transparency duties are now in effect. High-risk obligations, including Article 14 human oversight for Annex III standalone systems, follow the updated EU AI Act timetable toward 2 December 2027; embedded Annex I systems follow later timing.
The delay changes the compliance calendar. It does not remove the evidence gap: consequential AI-assisted decisions still need records that can be examined.