Human Judgment Continuity
Continuity of human judgment does not mean consistency of opinion. It means that the path between judgments can be traced.
Why Continuity Matters
As AI becomes a persistent part of decision environments — recommending, processing, automating — the risk is not that humans stop deciding.
The risk is that the thread between a person's prior context, present judgment, and future revisit becomes impossible to follow.
Continuity Is Not Consistency
The person must hold the same position.
The change of position is recorded and attributable.
When Caneni's Rkav protocol captures a revision marker, it treats reconsideration as a qualified continuation, not a break in the record.
Within Digital Architecture
Human Judgment Continuity is one dimension within Digital Architecture for Human Subjectness. It describes what happens after judgment: the persistence of the path through consequence and return.
Room → Judgment → Trace → Return → next judgment